TNN23: The Franco-Arabic Tribunal

On this edition of TNN, the desk convened a panel on the questions dividing the timeline. Joining were Bahya, attorney, and Ziad, Head of Digital Ethics. Whether the second title is real was not established before air.

The panel opened on Franco-Arabic. Ziad defended the practice, citing an unbroken record since 2009. Bahya argued it is inappropriate for a man of his age. On the matter of people who hold loud speakerphone conversations in public, Ziad recalled finding it useful during a broken-phone period before turning against it; Bahya confirmed she enjoys the gossip. On Crocs, Ziad cited comfort, and Bahya cited smell and the dignity of the university.

The discussion moved to people who make plans and cancel at the last minute. Ziad admitted to the practice and advised ignoring its other practitioners. Bahya announced she is against Ziad personally. On people who send many vague, unclear messages, Ziad confirmed he sends them deliberately, to bother his friends, and then becomes upset. Bahya reiterated that she opposes anything Ziad says. The desk thanked both guests.

Those were the headlines. I was Omar Sadek with you from TNN.

Headlines

— Ziad defends Franco-Arabic, unbroken since 2009.

— Bahya rules it inappropriate for his age.

— Public speakerphone debated; Bahya admits to the gossip.

— Crocs split the panel on comfort versus smell.

— Ziad confesses to canceling plans, advises ignoring others who do.

— Ziad sends vague messages on purpose, then gets upset.

— Bahya declares herself against Ziad personally.